نمونه رایتینگ تسک ۲ آکادمیک همراه با جواب 2026

Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

What are the causes, and what solutions can you suggest?

Is this a positive or negative development?

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

One reason is that students need to make everyday decisions independently. A young adult may understand advanced mathematics yet struggle to compare loan conditions or plan a monthly budget. Lessons on saving, borrowing and household spending could help students apply numerical knowledge to realistic situations. For example, a class could compare the total costs of different mobile phone contracts instead of only completing abstract calculations. Such activities would make academic learning more useful while introducing habits that students could continue into adulthood.

Practical education can also help students take greater responsibility for their health. Learning to prepare a few balanced meals would give them an alternative to relying entirely on convenience food when they move away from home. These lessons need not become a separate, demanding subject. Schools could incorporate food preparation into health education and budgeting into mathematics. This approach would limit pressure on timetables and allow teachers to connect practical tasks with existing learning goals. Although families also have a role, not all children receive the same guidance at home, so schools can provide a shared starting point.

In conclusion, schools should prepare students for both academic progress and independent living. Integrating practical skills into existing subjects would achieve this balance without reducing the importance of traditional education.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Supporters of online education emphasise its convenience. Students can attend lessons without travelling, which makes study more manageable for people with jobs or family responsibilities. Recorded materials also allow learners to revisit difficult explanations at their own pace. For instance, someone studying after work can pause a lecture and review an unfamiliar concept before continuing. However, these benefits depend on reliable internet access and the ability to organise study independently. Without those conditions, flexibility may lead to irregular participation rather than better learning.

Those who prefer classroom teaching argue that direct contact supports understanding and motivation. Teachers can notice confusion, adjust their explanations and encourage quieter students to participate. In practical subjects, learners may also need equipment or supervised activities that cannot easily be provided at home. A laboratory session, for example, gives students experience with procedures as well as theoretical knowledge. Nevertheless, requiring attendance for every lecture can create unnecessary difficulties for learners who live far away. I therefore favour online delivery for suitable theoretical content, alongside in-person sessions for discussion and practical work.

In conclusion, both methods have strengths that address different learning needs. A carefully planned combination can preserve the accessibility of online education while retaining the interaction and practical experience offered by classroom teaching.

Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

The main benefit is the removal of the daily commute. Employees can use the time previously spent travelling to rest, exercise or manage household responsibilities. This can make full-time employment more accessible to people who would otherwise struggle with a rigid office schedule. Employers also gain access to candidates living beyond the immediate area, increasing their chances of finding suitable staff. For example, a small company could recruit an experienced designer from another city without requiring relocation. These advantages can improve both individual opportunities and organisational flexibility.

However, remote work can create problems. Informal conversations are harder to reproduce online, and new employees may find it difficult to obtain quick guidance. Some workers also feel pressure to remain available outside normal hours because their workplace is always nearby. These disadvantages matter, but they can often be reduced through deliberate management. Scheduled check-ins, shared documentation and agreed response times can support communication, while clear working hours protect personal time. Occasional in-person meetings may also help teams build relationships. Remote work is therefore most suitable for roles that do not require continuous physical presence, rather than being a universal replacement for offices.

In conclusion, the savings in travel time and the wider access to employment offer substantial benefits. For suitable jobs, these outweigh the drawbacks, provided that organisations actively address communication needs and maintain reasonable boundaries.

What are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to address it?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

One major cause is the organisation of work and leisure. Office employees may spend most of the day seated, then return home tired and choose screen-based entertainment. Long journeys to work further reduce the time available for exercise. Another obstacle is the lack of convenient facilities. If pavements are unsafe or affordable sports centres are far away, people have fewer realistic opportunities to be active. For example, a parent with limited free time may be unable to travel across town for a fitness class, even if they would like to attend.

Solutions should make movement easier to incorporate into existing routines. Employers could encourage short activity breaks and provide facilities for staff who cycle to work. Local authorities could improve pavements, create safe cycling routes and offer affordable activities in neighbourhood centres. These measures would address practical barriers instead of depending entirely on personal motivation. Individuals could also begin with manageable changes, such as walking for short errands or taking a brief walk after lunch. Activities that fit daily responsibilities are more likely to be maintained than demanding programmes that require substantial travel or expense.

In conclusion, insufficient exercise results from both sedentary habits and limited opportunities for convenient activity. Coordinated changes in workplaces, neighbourhoods and personal routines could help adults move more regularly without making exercise another difficult obligation.

Why is this happening?
Is this a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A central reason is that opportunities are not always available near the family home. Universities and suitable jobs may be concentrated in other cities, making relocation necessary. Living independently can therefore be a practical response to circumstances rather than a rejection of family relationships. Personal preferences also play a role. Young adults may want to organise their schedules, make household decisions and develop a lifestyle that suits them. For instance, someone working irregular hours may find it easier to manage daily routines in their own accommodation than in a shared family household.

This development can be beneficial because it encourages responsibility through direct experience. Managing rent, preparing meals and maintaining a home require planning and cooperation. These experiences can help young adults recognise the consequences of their decisions and become more confident in solving everyday problems. Nevertheless, independence does not automatically produce these benefits. High housing costs or social isolation can create serious difficulties, particularly when a person moves before securing a stable income. Maintaining contact with family and choosing affordable accommodation are therefore important. The positive effects are strongest when independence is gradual and financially realistic.

In conclusion, young adults often leave home to pursue opportunities and gain control over their daily lives. This is usually a constructive change, provided that it develops responsibility without exposing them to unmanageable financial or emotional pressure.